|
The challenge to produce
effective and safe vaccines for the prevalent infectious diseases of
humans and animals has become increasingly difficult. In veterinary
medicine, evidence implicating vaccines in triggering immune-mediated
and other chronic disorders (vaccinosis) is compelling. While some of
these problems have been traced to contaminated or poorly attenuated
batches of vaccine that revert to virulence, others apparently reflect
the host=s genetic predisposition to react adversely upon receiving
the single (monovalent) or multiple antigen “combo” (polyvalent)
products given routinely to animals. Animals of certain susceptible
breeds or families appear to be at increased risk for severe and
lingering adverse reactions to vaccines.
The onset of adverse
reactions to conventional vaccinations (or other inciting drugs,
chemicals, or infectious agents) can be an immediate hypersensitivity
or anaphylactic reaction, or can occur acutely (24-48 hours
afterwards), or later on (10-45 days) in a delayed type immune
response often caused by immune-complex formation. Typical signs of
adverse immune reactions include fever, stiffness, sore joints and
abdominal tenderness, susceptibility to infections, central and
peripheral nervous system disorders or inflammation, collapse with
autoagglutinated red blood cells and jaundice, or generalized pinpoint
hemorrhages or bruises. Liver enzymes may be markedly elevated, and
liver or kidney failure may accompany bone marrow suppression.
Furthermore, recent vaccination of genetically susceptible breeds has
been associated with transient seizures in puppies and adult dogs, as
well as a variety of autoimmune diseases including those affecting the
blood, endocrine organs, joints, skin and mucosa, central nervous
system, eyes, muscles, liver, kidneys, and bowel. It is postulated
that an underlying genetic predisposition to these conditions places
other littermates and close relatives at increased risk.
In cats, while adverse
vaccine reactions may be less common, aggressive tumors (fibrosarcomas)
can occasionally arise at the site of vaccination. A recent study from
Italy reported finding similar tumors in dogs at the injection sites
of vaccinations (Vascellari et al, 2003). These investigators stated
that their “study identified distinct similarities between canine
fibrosarcomas from presumed injection sites and feline post-vaccinal
fibrosarcomas, suggesting the possibility of the development of
post-injection sarcomas not only in cats, but also in dogs”.
Additionally, vaccination
of pet and research dogs with polyvalent vaccines containing rabies
virus or rabies vaccine alone was shown to induce production of
antithyroglobulin autoantibodies, a provocative and important finding
with implications for the subsequent development of hypothyroidism
(Scott-Moncrieff et al, 2002).
Vaccination also can
overwhelm the immunocompromised or even healthy host that is
repeatedly challenged with other environmental stimuli and is
genetically predisposed to react adversely upon viral exposure. The
recently weaned young puppy or kitten entering a new environment is at
greater risk here, as its relatively immature immune system can be
temporarily or more permanently harmed. Consequences in later life may
be the increased susceptibility to chronic debilitating diseases.
As combination vaccines
contain antigens other than those of the clinically important
infectious disease agents, some may be unnecessary; and their use may
increase the risk of adverse reactions. With the exception of recently
introduced mutivalent Leptospira spp. vaccines, the other
leptospirosis vaccines afford little protection against the clinically
important fields strains of leptospirosis, and the antibodies they
elicit typically last only a few months. Other vaccines, such as for
Lyme disease, may be advisable only in those geographical areas where
the risk of exposure to Borrelia burgdorferi is significant. Annual or
biannual revaccination for rabies is required by some states even
though most USDA licensed rabies vaccine have a 3-year duration. Thus,
the overall risk-benefit ratio of using certain vaccines or multiple
antigen vaccines given simultaneously and repeatedly should be
reexamined. It must be recognized, however, that we have the luxury of
asking such questions today only because the risk of disease has been
effectively reduced by the widespread use of vaccination programs.
Given this troublesome
situation, what are the experts saying about these issues? In 1995, a
landmark review commentary focused the attention of the veterinary
profession on the advisability of current vaccine practices. Are we
overvaccinating companion animals, and if so, what is the appropriate
periodicity of booster vaccines ? Discussion of this provocative topic
has generally lead to other questions about the duration of immunity
conferred by the currently licensed vaccine components.
In response to questions
posed in the first part of this article, veterinary vaccinologists
have recommended new protocols for dogs and cats. These include: 1)
giving the puppy or kitten vaccine series followed by a booster at one
year of age; 2) administering further boosters in a combination
vaccine every three years or as split components alternating every
other year until; 3) the pet reaches geriatric age, at which time
booster vaccination is likely to be unnecessary and may be unadvisable
for those with aging or immunologic disorders. In the intervening
years between booster vaccinations, and in the case of geriatric pets,
circulating humoral immunity can be evaluated by measuring serum
vaccine antibody titers as an indication of the presence of Aimmune
memory@. Titers do not distinguish between immunity generated by
vaccination and/or exposure to the disease, although the magnitude of
immunity produced just by vaccination is usually lower (see Tables).
Except where vaccination
is required by law, all animals, but especially those dogs or close
relatives that previously experienced an adverse reaction to
vaccination can have serum antibody titers measured annually instead
of revaccination. If adequate titers are found, the animal should not
need revaccination until some future date. Rechecking antibody titers
can be performed annually, thereafter, or can be offered as an
alternative to pet owners who prefer not to follow the conventional
practice of annual boosters. Reliable serologic vaccine titering is
available from several university and commercial laboratories and the
cost is reasonable (Twark and Dodds, 2000; Lappin et al, 2002; Paul et
al, 2003; Moore and Glickman, 2004).
Relatively little has been
published about the duration of immunity following vaccination,
although new data are beginning to appear for both dogs and cats.
Our recent study (Twark
and Dodds, 2000), evaluated 1441 dogs for CPV antibody titer and 1379
dogs for CDV antibody titer. Of these, 95.1 % were judged to have
adequate CPV titers, and nearly all (97.6 %) had adequate CDV titers.
Vaccine histories were available for 444 dogs (CPV) and 433 dogs (CDV).
Only 43 dogs had been vaccinated within the previous year, with the
majority of dogs (268 or 60%) having received a booster vaccination
1-2 years beforehand. On the basis of our data, we concluded that
annual revaccination is unnecessary. Similar findings and conclusions
have been published recently for dogs in New Zealand (Kyle et al,
2002), and cats (Scott and Geissinger, 1999; Lappin et al, 2002).
Comprehensive studies of the duration of serologic response to five
viral vaccine antigens in dogs and three viral vaccine antigens in
cats were recently published by researchers at Pfizer Animal Health (
Mouzin et al, 2004).
When an adequate immune
memory has already been established, there is little reason to
introduce unnecessary antigen, adjuvant, and preservatives by
administering booster vaccines. By titering annually, one can assess
whether a given animal=s humoral immune response has fallen below
levels of adequate immune memory. In that event, an appropriate
vaccine booster can be administered.
References
- Dodds WJ. More bumps on the vaccine
road. Adv Vet Med 41:715-732, 1999.
- Dodds WJ. Vaccination protocols for
dogs predisposed to vaccine reactions. J Am An Hosp Assoc 38: 1-4,
2001.
- Hogenesch H, Azcona-Olivera J,
Scott-Moncreiff C, et al. Vaccine-induced autoimmunity in the dog.
Adv Vet Med 41: 733-744, 1999.
- Hustead DR, Carpenter T, Sawyer DC,
et al. Vaccination issues of concern to practitioners. J Am Vet Med
Assoc 214: 1000-1002, 1999.
- Kyle AHM, Squires RA,Davies PR.
Serologic status and response to vaccination against canine
distemper (CDV) and canine parvovirus (CPV) of dogs vaccinated at
different intervals. J Sm An Pract, June 2002.
- Lappin MR, Andrews J, Simpson D, et
al. Use of serologic tests to predict resistance to feline
herpesvirus 1, feline calicivirus, and feline parvovirus infection
in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 220: 38-42, 2002.
- McGaw DL, Thompson M, Tate, D, et
al. Serum distemper virus and parvovirus antibody titers among dogs
brought to a veterinary hospital for revaccination. J Am Vet Med
Assoc 213: 72-75, 1998.
- Moore GE, Glickman LT. A perspective
on vaccine guidelines and titer tests for dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc
224: 200-203. 2004.
- Mouzin DE, Lorenzen M J, Haworth, et
al. Duration of serologic response to five viral antigens in dogs. J
Am Vet Med Assoc 224: 55-60, 2004.
- Mouzin DE, Lorenzen M J, Haworth, et
al. Duration of serologic response to three viral antigens in cats.
J Am Vet Med Assoc 224: 61-66, 2004.
- Paul MA.Credibility in the face of
controversy. Am An Hosp Assoc Trends MagazineXIV(2):19-21,1998.
- Paul MA (chair) et al. Report of the
AAHA Canine Vaccine Task Force: 2003 canine vaccine guidelines,
recommendations, and supporting literature. AAHA, April 2003, 28 pp.
- Schultz RD. Current and future
canine and feline vaccination programs. Vet Med 93:233-254, 1998.
- Schultz RD, Ford RB, Olsen J, Scott
F. Titer testing and vaccination: a new look at traditional
practices. Vet Med, 97: 1-13, 2002 (insert).
- Scott FW, Geissinger CM. Long-term
immunity in cats vaccinated with an inactivated trivalent vaccine.
Am J Vet Res 60: 652-658, 1999.
- Scott-Moncrieff JC, Azcona-Olivera
J, Glickman NW, et al. Evaluation of antithyroglobulin antibodies
after routine vaccination in pet and research dogs. J Am Vet Med
Assoc 221: 515-521, 2002.
- Smith CA. Are we vaccinating too
much? J Am Vet Med Assoc 207:421-425, 1995.
- Tizard I, Ni Y. Use of serologic
testing to assess immune status of companion animals. J Am Vet Med
Assoc 213: 54-60, 1998.
- Twark L, Dodds WJ. Clinical
application of serum parvovirus and distemper virus antibody titers
for determining revaccination strategies in healthy dogs. J Am Vet
Med Assoc 217:1021-1024, 2000.
- Vascellari M, Melchiotti E, Bozza MA
et al. Fibrosarcomas at presumed sites of injection in dogs:
characteristics and comparison with non-vaccination site
fibrosarcomas and feline post-vaccinal firosarcomas. J Vet Med 50
(6): 286-291, 2003.
|
Table 1. “Core” Vaccines * |
|
Dog |
Cat |
|
Distemper |
Feline Parvovirus |
|
Adenovirus |
Herpesvirus |
|
Parvovirus |
Calicivirus |
|
Rabies |
Rabies |
_______________________________________
* Vaccines that every dog and cat should have |
|
Table 2. Adverse Reaction Risks for
Vaccines *
“There is less risk associated with taking a blood sample
for a titer test than giving an unnecessary vaccination.”
_______________________________________________
* Veterinary Medicine, February, 2002.
|
|
Table 3. Titer
Testing and Vaccination *
“While difficult to prove, risks
associated with overvaccination
are an increasing concern among veterinarians. These experts
say antibody titer testing may prove to be a valuable tool in
determining your patients’ vaccination needs.”
_____________________________________________________
* Veterinary Medicine, February, 2002.
|
|
Table 4. Vaccine
Titer Testing *
“Research shows that once an
animal’s titer stabilizes,
it is likely to remain constant for many years.”
_____________________________________________
* Veterinary Medicine, February, 2002. |
|